cm/controlmapping
Sources
HIPAA · §164.310 Physical safeguards
§164.310(d)(2)(ii)

Media Re-use

frameworkHIPAA Security Rule section§164.310 Physical safeguards statusRequired csf 2.0— topics— frameworks1 0 0 12
Official textImplement procedures for the removal of ePHI from electronic media before the media become available for reuse.45 CFR Part 164 Subpart C, via NIST SP 800-66r2 (public domain)

Wrong or missing mapping? Report it

Equivalents of §164.310(d)(2)(ii) in other frameworks
FrameworkRequirementTitleLinkSource / reason
NIST CSF 2.0—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
ISO 27001—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
CIS v8.1—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (most CIS links are editorial: CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards).
SOC 2—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (SOC 2 links are editorial only).
PCI DSS—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
CMMC—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
800-53MP-6Media SanitizationCrosswalkNIST HIPAA → SP 800-53 crosswalk
GDPR—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (only GDPR's security articles are mapped, editorially).
NIS2—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
Essential Eight—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (Essential Eight links are editorial only).
DORA—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (DORA links are editorial, and its technical standards are not mapped).
CPS 234—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (CPS 234 is principles-based and its links are editorial).
Cyber Essentials—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (Cyber Essentials covers five technical controls only).

Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · Loosely related only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.