NIS2 · 7. Assessing the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk-management measures
7.1
Policies and procedures to assess the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk-management measures
frameworkNIS2 Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690
section7. Assessing the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk-management measures
csf 2.0GV.RM-06
topicsRisk Management
frameworks5 5 3
Official text · not licensableTitle from ENISA's guidance: Policies and procedures to assess the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk-management measures. See the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 for the legal text.
Wrong or missing mapping? Report it
| Framework | Requirement | Title | Link | Source / reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIST CSF 2.0 | GV.RM-01GV.RM-02GV.RM-03GV.RM-06 | Risk management objectives are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders; Risk appetite and risk tolerance statements are established, communicated, and maintained… | Crosswalk | Same topic: Risk Management |
| ISO 27001 | Clause 6.1.1Clause 6.1.3Clause 6.2Clause 9.1Clause 9.3 | General; Information security risk treatment… | Crosswalk | Same topic: Risk Management ENISA NIS2 → ISO 27001 mapping 2 loosely related (not mappings) |
| CIS v8.1 | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (most CIS links are editorial: CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards). |
| SOC 2 | CC3.1CC5.1CC9.1 | Objectives specified clearly enough to identify risks; Control activities that mitigate risks… | Editorial | Same topic: Risk Management (editorial pick) |
| PCI DSS | 12.3.1 | Targeted risk analysis for flexible-frequency requirements | Crosswalk | Same topic: Risk Management15 loosely related (not mappings)5.2.3.1 Re-evaluation frequency set by targeted risk analysis Only shares CSF GV.RM-06: related, not a mapping 5.3.2.1 Scan frequency set by targeted risk analysis Only shares CSF GV.RM-06: related, not a mapping 7.2.5.1 System and application account access periodically reviewed Only shares CSF GV.RM-06: related, not a mapping 8.6.3 System account passwords protected and changed Only shares CSF GV.RM-06: related, not a mapping 9.5.1.2.1 Inspection frequency set by targeted risk analysis Only shares CSF GV.RM-06: related, not a mapping 10.4.2.1 Review frequency set by targeted risk analysis Only shares CSF GV.RM-06: related, not a mapping …and 7 more in the downloads |
| CMMC | RA.L2-3.11.1 | Risk Assessments | Crosswalk | Same topic: Risk Management |
| 800-53 | PM-9PM-28RA-7 | Risk Management Strategy; Risk Framing… | Crosswalk | Same topic: Risk Management |
| HIPAA | §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B) | Risk Management | Editorial | Same topic: Risk Management (editorial pick)2 loosely related (not mappings) |
| GDPR | Art.24(1)Art.32(2) | Responsibility of the controller; Security of processing | Editorial | Same topic: Risk Management (editorial pick) |
| Essential Eight | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (Essential Eight links are editorial only). |
| DORA | Art.5(2)(a)Art.6(1)Art.6(8)Art.16(1)Art.24(1) | Governance and organisation; ICT risk management framework… | Editorial | Same topic: Risk Management (editorial pick) |
| CPS 234 | Para 13Para 15Para 27Para 31 | Board ultimately responsible for information security; Maintain a capability commensurate with threats… | Editorial | Same topic: Risk Management (editorial pick) |
| Cyber Essentials | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (Cyber Essentials covers five technical controls only). |
Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.