800-53 · AC Access Control
AC-2(12)
Account Monitoring for Atypical Usage
frameworkNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.2
sectionAC Access Control
csf 2.0DE.CM-03 GV.RR-04
topicsInsider Threat
frameworks5 3 2
Official text(a) Monitor system accounts for [Assignment: organization-defined atypical usage]; and
(b) Report atypical usage of system accounts to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles].NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.2 control statement (public domain)
(b) Report atypical usage of system accounts to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles].NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.2 control statement (public domain)
Wrong or missing mapping? Report it
| Framework | Requirement | Title | Link | Source / reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIST CSF 2.0 | DE.CM-03GV.RR-04 | Personnel activity and technology usage are monitored to find potentially adverse events; Cybersecurity is included in human resources practices | Crosswalk | Same topic: Insider Threat |
| ISO 27001 | A.6.1A.6.4A.8.16 | Screening; Disciplinary process… | Crosswalk | Same topic: Insider Threat |
| CIS v8.1 | CIS 6.1CIS 6.2CIS 10.7CIS 13.6 | Establish an Access Granting Process; Establish an Access Revoking Process… | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.RR-04, DE.CM-03: related, not a mapping | |
| SOC 2 | CC7.2 | Monitoring system components for anomalies | No mapping. Only shares CSF DE.CM-03: related, not a mapping | |
| PCI DSS | 10.2.112.7.1 | Audit logs enabled and active; Personnel screened before hire | Crosswalk | Same topic: Insider Threat7 loosely related (not mappings)7.2.2 Access assigned by job function and least privilege Only shares CSF GV.RR-04: related, not a mapping 8.2.2 Shared or generic accounts only by documented exception Only shares CSF DE.CM-03: related, not a mapping 9.3.1.1 Sensitive-area access authorised and revoked promptly Only shares CSF GV.RR-04: related, not a mapping 10.4.1 Security event and critical logs reviewed daily Only shares CSF DE.CM-03: related, not a mapping 12.6.3 Awareness training on hire and at least annually Only shares CSF GV.RR-04: related, not a mapping |
| CMMC | AT.L2-3.2.3AU.L2-3.3.2PS.L2-3.9.1 | Insider Threat Awareness; User Accountability… | Editorial | Same topic: Insider Threat (editorial pick)5 loosely related (not mappings) |
| HIPAA | §164.308(a)(3)(ii)(B)§164.308(a)(1)(ii)(C) | Workforce Clearance Procedure; Sanction Policy | Crosswalk | Same topic: Insider Threat17 loosely related (not mappings)§164.308(a)(3)(ii)(A) Authorization and/or Supervision Only shares CSF DE.CM-03, GV.RR-04: related, not a mapping §164.308(a)(4)(ii)(B) Access Authorization Only shares CSF DE.CM-03, GV.RR-04: related, not a mapping §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review Only shares CSF DE.CM-03: related, not a mapping §164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification Only shares CSF DE.CM-03: related, not a mapping …and 9 more in the downloads |
| GDPR | Art.29Art.32(4) | Processing under the authority of the controller or processor; Security of processing | Editorial | Same topic: Insider Threat (editorial pick) |
| NIS2 | 10.210.4 | Verification of Background; Disciplinary process | Crosswalk | Same topic: Insider Threat |
| Essential Eight | ISM-0109ISM-1906ISM-1907 | Event logs from workstations are analysed in a timely manner to detect cyber security…; Event logs from internet-facing servers are analysed in a timely manner to detect cyber…… | No mapping. Only shares CSF DE.CM-03: related, not a mapping | |
| DORA | Art.10(3) | Detection | Editorial | Same topic: Insider Threat (editorial pick)1 loosely related (not mappings) |
| CPS 234 | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (CPS 234 is principles-based and its links are editorial). |
| Cyber Essentials | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (Cyber Essentials covers five technical controls only). |
Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.