cm/controlmapping
Sources
800-53 · CP Contingency Planning
CP-3

Contingency Training

frameworkNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.2 sectionCP Contingency Planning csf 2.0— topics— frameworks2 0 0 11
Official texta. Provide contingency training to system users consistent with assigned roles and responsibilities:
1. Within [Assignment: organization-defined time period] of assuming a contingency role or responsibility;
2. When required by system changes; and
3. [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] thereafter; and
b. Review and update contingency training content [Assignment: organization-defined frequency] and following [Assignment: organization-defined events].
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.2 control statement (public domain)

Wrong or missing mapping? Report it

Equivalents of CP-3 in other frameworks
FrameworkRequirementTitleLinkSource / reason
NIST CSF 2.0—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
ISO 27001A.6.3Information security awareness, education and trainingCrosswalkNIST SP 800-53 → ISO 27001 mapping
CIS v8.1—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (most CIS links are editorial: CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards).
SOC 2—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (SOC 2 links are editorial only).
PCI DSS—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
CMMC—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
HIPAA§164.308(a)(7)(ii)(D)Testing and Revision ProcedureCrosswalkNIST HIPAA → SP 800-53 crosswalk
GDPR—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (only GDPR's security articles are mapped, editorially).
NIS2—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
Essential Eight—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (Essential Eight links are editorial only).
DORA—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (DORA links are editorial, and its technical standards are not mapped).
CPS 234—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (CPS 234 is principles-based and its links are editorial).
Cyber Essentials—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (Cyber Essentials covers five technical controls only).

Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · Loosely related only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.