800-53 · IR Incident Response
IR-9
Information Spillage Response
Official textRespond to information spills by:
a. Assigning [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] with responsibility for responding to information spills;
b. Identifying the specific information involved in the system contamination;
c. Alerting [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] of the information spill using a method of communication not associated with the spill;
d. Isolating the contaminated system or system component;
e. Eradicating the information from the contaminated system or component;
f. Identifying other systems or system components that may have been subsequently contaminated; and
g. Performing the following additional actions: [Assignment: organization-defined actions].NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.2 control statement (public domain)
a. Assigning [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] with responsibility for responding to information spills;
b. Identifying the specific information involved in the system contamination;
c. Alerting [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] of the information spill using a method of communication not associated with the spill;
d. Isolating the contaminated system or system component;
e. Eradicating the information from the contaminated system or component;
f. Identifying other systems or system components that may have been subsequently contaminated; and
g. Performing the following additional actions: [Assignment: organization-defined actions].NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.2 control statement (public domain)
Wrong or missing mapping? Report it
| Framework | Requirement | Title | Link | Source / reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIST CSF 2.0 | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data. |
| ISO 27001 | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data. |
| CIS v8.1 | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (most CIS links are editorial: CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards). |
| SOC 2 | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (SOC 2 links are editorial only). |
| PCI DSS | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data. |
| CMMC | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data. |
| HIPAA | §164.308(a)(6)(ii) | Response and Reporting | Crosswalk | NIST HIPAA → SP 800-53 crosswalk |
| GDPR | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (only GDPR's security articles are mapped, editorially). |
| NIS2 | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data. |
| Essential Eight | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (Essential Eight links are editorial only). |
| DORA | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (DORA links are editorial, and its technical standards are not mapped). |
| CPS 234 | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (CPS 234 is principles-based and its links are editorial). |
| Cyber Essentials | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (Cyber Essentials covers five technical controls only). |
Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.