cm/controlmapping
Sources
NIST CSF 2.0 · Govern (GV)
GV.RM-04

Strategic direction that describes appropriate risk response options is established and communicated

frameworkNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 sectionGovern (GV) topics— frameworks0 0 3 10

Wrong or missing mapping? Report it

Equivalents of GV.RM-04 in other frameworks
FrameworkRequirementTitleLinkSource / reason
ISO 27001A.5.1Clause 6.1.3Policies for information security; Information security risk treatmentLoosely relatedNo mapping. Only shares CSF GV.RM-04: related, not a mapping
CIS v8.1—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (most CIS links are editorial: CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards).
SOC 2—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (SOC 2 links are editorial only).
PCI DSS12.10.112.10.212.10.6Incident response plan ready to activate; Incident response plan reviewed and tested annually…Loosely relatedNo mapping. Only shares CSF GV.RM-04: related, not a mapping
CMMC—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
800-53PM-9PM-28PM-30SR-2Risk Management Strategy; Risk Framing…Loosely relatedNo mapping. Only shares CSF GV.RM-04: related, not a mapping
HIPAA—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
GDPR—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (only GDPR's security articles are mapped, editorially).
NIS2—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
Essential Eight—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (Essential Eight links are editorial only).
DORA—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (DORA links are editorial, and its technical standards are not mapped).
CPS 234—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (CPS 234 is principles-based and its links are editorial).
Cyber Essentials—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (Cyber Essentials covers five technical controls only).

Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · Loosely related only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.