cm/controlmapping
Sources
NIST CSF 2.0 · Protect (PR)
PR.PS-05

Installation and execution of unauthorized software are prevented

frameworkNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 sectionProtect (PR) topicsEndpoint Protection frameworks5 5 0 3

Wrong or missing mapping? Report it

Equivalents of PR.PS-05 in other frameworks
FrameworkRequirementTitleLinkSource / reason
ISO 27001A.8.19A.8.1A.8.7Installation of software on operational systems; User endpoint devices…CrosswalkSame topic: Endpoint Protection
CIS v8.1CIS 2.5CIS 10.1CIS 2.6CIS 2.7CIS 10.2CIS 10.3CIS 10.4CIS 10.5CIS 10.6CIS 10.7Allowlist Authorized Software; Deploy and Maintain Anti-Malware Software…CrosswalkSame topic: Endpoint Protection
SOC 2CC6.8Preventing or detecting unauthorized or malicious softwareEditorialSame topic: Endpoint Protection (editorial pick)
PCI DSS5.2.15.2.25.3.2Anti-malware deployed on system components; Anti-malware detects, removes or contains known malware…CrosswalkSame topic: Endpoint Protection
2 loosely related (not mappings)
2.2.1 System configuration standards developed and maintained Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
6.4.3 Payment page scripts authorised and integrity-checked Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
CMMCSI.L2-3.14.2SI.L2-3.14.4Malicious Code Protection; Update Malicious Code ProtectionEditorialSame topic: Endpoint Protection (editorial pick)
800-53CM-7(5)SI-4SI-3Authorized Software — Allow-by-exception; System Monitoring…CrosswalkSame topic: Endpoint Protection
2 loosely related (not mappings)
CM-7 Least Functionality Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
SC-34 Non-modifiable Executable Programs Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
HIPAA§164.308(a)(5)(ii)(B)Protection from Malicious SoftwareEditorialSame topic: Endpoint Protection (editorial pick)
GDPR—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (only GDPR's security articles are mapped, editorially).
NIS26.9Protection against malicious and unauthorised softwareCrosswalkSame topic: Endpoint Protection
1 loosely related (not mappings)
6.7 Network security Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
Essential EightISM-0843ISM-1488ISM-1490ISM-1544ISM-1657ISM-1870Application control is implemented on workstations; Microsoft Office macros in files originating from the internet are blocked…EditorialSame topic: Endpoint Protection (editorial pick)
16 loosely related (not mappings)
ISM-1487 Only privileged human users responsible for checking that Microsoft Office macros are… Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
ISM-1489 Microsoft Office macro security settings cannot be changed by human users Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
ISM-1582 Application control rulesets are validated at least annually Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
ISM-1656 Application control is implemented on non-internet-facing servers Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
ISM-1658 Application control restricts the execution of drivers to an organisation-approved set Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
ISM-1659 Microsoft’s vulnerable driver blocklist is implemented Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
ISM-1660 Allowed and blocked application control events are centrally logged Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
ISM-1671 Microsoft Office macros are disabled for human users that do not have a demonstrated… Loosely related
Only shares CSF PR.PS-05: related, not a mapping
…and 8 more in the downloads
DORA—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (DORA links are editorial, and its technical standards are not mapped).
CPS 234—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (CPS 234 is principles-based and its links are editorial).
Cyber EssentialsCE 5Malware protectionEditorialSame topic: Endpoint Protection (editorial pick)

Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · Loosely related only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.