cm/controlmapping
Sources
SOC 2 · P Privacy
P4.2

Retention of personal information

frameworkSOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria) sectionP Privacy csf 2.0— topics— frameworks0 1 0 12
Official text · not licensableSummary (ControlMapping's wording): Retention of personal information. The criterion text is AICPA's copyright.

Wrong or missing mapping? Report it

Equivalents of P4.2 in other frameworks
FrameworkRequirementTitleLinkSource / reason
NIST CSF 2.0—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
ISO 27001A.5.33A.5.34Protection of records; Privacy and protection of PIIEditorialControlMapping editorial: Retaining personal information only as long as needed: protection of records (A.5.33) and PII protection (A.5.34). ISO 27001 has no retention-schedule requirement of its own.
CIS v8.1—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (most CIS links are editorial: CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards).
PCI DSS—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
CMMC—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
800-53—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
HIPAA—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
GDPR—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (only GDPR's security articles are mapped, editorially).
NIS2—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
Essential Eight—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (Essential Eight links are editorial only).
DORA—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (DORA links are editorial, and its technical standards are not mapped).
CPS 234—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (CPS 234 is principles-based and its links are editorial).
Cyber Essentials—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (Cyber Essentials covers five technical controls only).

Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · Loosely related only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.