cm/controlmapping
Sources
SOC 2 · P Privacy
P6.6

Breach notification to affected individuals

frameworkSOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria) sectionP Privacy csf 2.0— topics— frameworks0 1 0 12
Official text · not licensableSummary (ControlMapping's wording): Breach notification to affected individuals. The criterion text is AICPA's copyright.

Wrong or missing mapping? Report it

Equivalents of P6.6 in other frameworks
FrameworkRequirementTitleLinkSource / reason
NIST CSF 2.0—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
ISO 27001A.5.24A.5.26A.5.34Information security incident management planning and preparation; Response to information security incidents…EditorialControlMapping editorial: Breach notification to affected parties and regulators: ISO's incident planning and response (A.5.24, A.5.26) plus legal PII obligations (A.5.34). ISO itself sets no notification deadline.
CIS v8.1—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (most CIS links are editorial: CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards).
PCI DSS—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
CMMC—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
800-53—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
HIPAA—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
GDPR—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (only GDPR's security articles are mapped, editorially).
NIS2—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data.
Essential Eight—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (Essential Eight links are editorial only).
DORA—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (DORA links are editorial, and its technical standards are not mapped).
CPS 234—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (CPS 234 is principles-based and its links are editorial).
Cyber Essentials—No requirementNo mapping in our dataNo mapping in our data (Cyber Essentials covers five technical controls only).

Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · Loosely related only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.