NIST CSF 2.0 · Detect (DE)
DE.AE-04
The estimated impact and scope of adverse events are understood
frameworkNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
sectionDetect (DE)
topicsAnomaly Detection
frameworks5 4 4
Wrong or missing mapping? Report it
| Framework | Requirement | Title | Link | Source / reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | A.8.16 | Monitoring activities | Crosswalk | Same topic: Anomaly Detection1 loosely related (not mappings)A.5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events Only shares CSF DE.AE-04: related, not a mapping |
| CIS v8.1 | CIS 8.11 | Conduct Audit Log Reviews | Crosswalk | Same topic: Anomaly Detection |
| SOC 2 | CC7.2 | Monitoring system components for anomalies | Editorial | Same topic: Anomaly Detection (editorial pick) |
| PCI DSS | 10.4.1.1 | Automated mechanisms for log review | Editorial | Same topic: Anomaly Detection (editorial pick) |
| CMMC | SI.L2-3.14.7 | Identify Unauthorized Use | Crosswalk | Same topic: Anomaly Detection |
| 800-53 | AU-6SI-4 | Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting; System Monitoring | Crosswalk | Same topic: Anomaly Detection5 loosely related (not mappings) |
| HIPAA | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data. |
| GDPR | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (only GDPR's security articles are mapped, editorially). |
| NIS2 | 3.4 | Event assessment and classification | Crosswalk | Same topic: Anomaly Detection1 loosely related (not mappings) |
| Essential Eight | ISM-1228 | Cyber security events are analysed in a timely manner to identify cyber security incidents | Editorial | Same topic: Anomaly Detection (editorial pick) |
| DORA | Art.10(1) | Detection | Editorial | Same topic: Anomaly Detection (editorial pick) |
| CPS 234 | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (CPS 234 is principles-based and its links are editorial). |
| Cyber Essentials | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (Cyber Essentials covers five technical controls only). |
Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.