cm/controlmapping
中文
来源
治理 (GV) · 主题

角色与职责

定义网络安全角色、职责和权限。

角色与职责由以下 NIST CSF 2.0 成果定义:GV.RR-01 (Organizational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and fosters a culture that is risk-aware, ethical, and continually improving); GV.RR-02 (Roles, responsibilities, and authorities related to cybersecurity risk management are established, communicated, understood, and enforced); GV.RR-03 (Adequate resources are allocated commensurate with the cybersecurity risk strategy, roles, responsibilities, and policies)。 对照映射 通过 ISO 27001, PCI DSS, 800-53, HIPAA 和 NIS2 中已发布的对照表完成映射。 编辑说明 在 SOC 2, GDPR, DORA 和 CPS 234 中经编辑映射。 弱相关 在 CIS v8.1 中仅弱相关。 本站数据中无映射 本站数据中 CMMC, Essential Eight 和 Cyber Essentials 无映射。

由……定义GV.RR-01 GV.RR-02 GV.RR-03 (NIST CSF 2.0) 框架14 个主题中有 10 个已有映射要求
← 覆盖矩阵
按框架列出的 角色与职责 要求
框架要求标题链接来源 / 原因
NIST CSF 2.0GV.RR-01GV.RR-02GV.RR-03Organizational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and fosters a culture that is risk-aware, ethical, and continually improving; Roles, responsibilities, and authorities related to cybersecurity risk management are established, communicated, understood, and enforced; Adequate resources are allocated commensurate with the cybersecurity risk strategy, roles, responsibilities, and policies主题定义
GV.RR-01
GV.RR-02
GV.RR-03
ISO 27001A.5.2A.5.4Information security roles and responsibilities; Management responsibilities对照映射
A.5.2: via GV.RR-02; NIST 800-53 map: PM-2, PM-29
A.5.4: via GV.RR-01
CIS v8.1CIS 14.1CIS 14.9未映射到此主题弱相关这些要求仅通过已发布的交叉映射与本主题的 CSF 成果(GV.RR-01, GV.RR-02, GV.RR-03)存在关联:值得核查,但不构成映射。
SOC 2CC1.3CC1.2CC1.5Structures, reporting lines, authorities and responsibilities; Board independence and oversight of internal control; Accountability for internal control responsibilities编辑说明
AICPA's TSC mappings are not openly licensed; ControlMapping editorial mapping (criterion summaries are ours, not AICPA text).
PCI DSS12.1.312.1.4Security roles and responsibilities defined; Executive responsibility for information security assigned对照映射
12.1.3: via GV.RR-01; GV.RR-02
12.1.4: via GV.RR-01; GV.RR-03
CMMC—无要求本站数据中无映射本站数据中没有 CMMC 要求映射到此主题。
800-53PM-2PS-9PM-29Information Security Program Leadership Role; Position Descriptions; Risk Management Program Leadership Roles对照映射
PM-2: via GV.RR-01; GV.RR-02
PS-9: Position descriptions must state security and privacy roles and responsibilities; NIST links PS-9 only to GV.RR-04 (HR practices), but it is the 800-53 control that writes roles down.
PM-29: via GV.RR-01; GV.RR-02
HIPAA§164.308(a)(2)Assigned Security Responsibility对照映射
§164.308(a)(2): via NIST HIPAA map: PM-2
GDPRArt.37(1)Art.39(1)Designation of the data protection officer; Tasks of the data protection officer编辑说明
No official crosswalk exists for GDPR; ControlMapping editorial mapping.
NIS21.2Roles, responsibilities and authorities对照映射
1.2: via GV.RR-02; ENISA ISO map: A.5.2, A.5.4
Essential Eight—无要求本站数据中无映射本站数据中没有 Essential Eight 要求映射到此主题。
DORAArt.5(2)(c)Art.6(4)Art.5(3)Governance and organisation; ICT risk management framework; Governance and organisation编辑说明
Art.5(2)(c): The management body sets clear roles and responsibilities for all ICT-related functions.
Art.6(4): An independent control function manages and oversees ICT risk, with segregated risk, control and audit functions.
Art.5(3): A role, or a senior manager, monitors arrangements with ICT third-party service providers.
CPS 234Para 13Para 14Board ultimately responsible for information security; Define information security roles and responsibilities编辑说明
Para 13: The Board is ultimately responsible for information security.
Para 14: Clearly define information security roles and responsibilities, from the Board to operations.
Cyber Essentials—无要求本站数据中无映射本站数据中没有 Cyber Essentials 要求映射到此主题。

主题定义 定义本主题的 CSF 2.0 结果 · 对照映射 至少一项选择有已发布对照表作为依据 · 编辑说明 ControlMapping 的判断及理由 · 弱相关 未映射,仅与该主题的 CSF 成果相同 · 本站数据中无映射 我们的数据中未映射任何内容;通常为新工作,但请查看覆盖范围说明. 方法说明.

要求编号和标题均按各框架官方发布的英文原文显示。

映射有误或缺失? 报告

关于角色与职责

明确界定的网络安全角色和职责有助于落实问责机制,避免整个组织的安全防护出现空白。这包括指定首席信息安全官(CISO)或同等职级的负责人、明确系统负责人的安全职责、设立安全委员会,以及记录安全决策的升级路径。在事件处置期间,角色划分是否清晰尤为关键:如果权限归属不明确,可能会延误响应时间,并扩大损害范围。

相关主题