cm/controlmapping
Sources
Comparison

DORA vs Cyber Essentials

DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554)  ·  UK Cyber Essentials (NCSC)  ·  data 2026-10-27

Requirement-level comparison of DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) and UK Cyber Essentials (NCSC), in both directions, derived from published crosswalks and ControlMapping's curated topics.

Have DORA → need Cyber Essentials

5 reqs 3 mapped · 2 loosely related · 0 no mapping Open in gap view →

Of 5 UK Cyber Essentials (NCSC) requirements, 3 map to something in DORA, 2 are only loosely related, and 0 have no mapping in our data.

Cyber Essentials certifies five technical controls only; governance, risk assessment, incident response and backup are deliberately outside its scope. All links are editorial.

Check these: only loosely related (a shared CSF outcome, not a mapping) (2)
Cyber EssentialsRequirementMatchDORAEvidence
Technical controls · 2
CE 2Secure ConfigurationLoosely relatedArt.9(4)(c)Art.28(8)Art.30(2)Only shares CSF PR.AA-05, PR.PS-01: related, not a mapping
CE 5Malware protectionLoosely relatedArt.9(1)Art.10(1)Art.10(3)Only shares CSF DE.CM-09: related, not a mapping
Mapped (3)
Cyber EssentialsRequirementMatchDORAEvidence
Technical controls · 3
CE 1FirewallsEditorialArt.9(4)(b)Same topic: Firewall / Net Seg (editorial pick)
CE 3Security Update ManagementEditorialArt.8(1)Art.8(2)Art.8(4)+5Same topic: Asset Management, Vulnerability Mgmt (editorial pick)
CE 4User Access ControlEditorialArt.9(4)(c)Art.9(4)(d)Art.28(8)+1Same topic: Access Control, Privileged Access, Multi-Factor Auth, Cloud Security (editorial pick)

Have Cyber Essentials → need DORA

22 reqs 7 mapped · 1 loosely related · 14 no mapping Open in gap view →

Of 22 DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) requirements, 7 map to something in Cyber Essentials, 1 are only loosely related, and 14 have no mapping in our data.

DORA here means the articles that bind financial entities, mapped editorially at paragraph level. The technical standards that add detail, such as Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774, are not mapped, so technical topics they cover show no link.

Likely new work: DORA requirements with no mapping to Cyber Essentials (14)
DORARequirementMatchCyber EssentialsEvidence
Chapter II: ICT risk management · 8
Art.5Governance and organisationNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Art.6ICT risk management frameworkNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Art.7ICT systems, protocols and toolsNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Art.11Response and recoveryNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Art.12Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery procedures and methodsNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Art.13Learning and evolvingNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Art.14CommunicationNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Art.16Simplified ICT risk management frameworkNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Chapter III: ICT-related incidents · 3
Art.17ICT-related incident management processNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Art.18Classification of ICT-related incidents and cyber threatsNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Art.19Reporting of major ICT-related incidents and voluntary notification of significant cyber threatsNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Chapter IV: Resilience testing · 1
Art.24General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testingNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Chapter V: ICT third-party risk · 1
Art.29Preliminary assessment of ICT concentration risk at entity levelNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Chapter VI: Information sharing · 1
Art.45Information-sharing arrangements on cyber threat information and intelligenceNo mapping in our data—No mapping to Cyber Essentials in our data.
Check these: only loosely related (a shared CSF outcome, not a mapping) (1)
DORARequirementMatchCyber EssentialsEvidence
Chapter II: ICT risk management · 1
Art.10DetectionLoosely relatedCE 5Only shares CSF DE.CM-09: related, not a mapping
Mapped (7)
DORARequirementMatchCyber EssentialsEvidence
Chapter II: ICT risk management · 2
Art.8IdentificationEditorialCE 3Same topic: Asset Management (editorial pick)
Art.9Protection and preventionEditorialCE 1CE 3Same topic: Firewall / Net Seg, Patch Management (editorial pick)
Chapter IV: Resilience testing · 3
Art.25Testing of ICT tools and systemsEditorialCE 3Same topic: Vulnerability Mgmt (editorial pick)
Art.26Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPTEditorialCE 3Same topic: Vulnerability Mgmt (editorial pick)
Art.27Requirements for testers for the carrying out of TLPTEditorialCE 3Same topic: Vulnerability Mgmt (editorial pick)
Chapter V: ICT third-party risk · 2
Art.28General principlesEditorialCE 4Same topic: Cloud Security (editorial pick)
Art.30Key contractual provisionsEditorialCE 4Same topic: Cloud Security (editorial pick)

By topic

Both cover (8):

Only DORA (31):

Only Cyber Essentials (3):

Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · Loosely related only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. Mapped = curated together in a ControlMapping topic, or linked directly. Crosswalks don't prove compliance. Methodology · Download the data · Report a mistake.