800-53 · SR Supply Chain Risk Management
SR-10
Inspection of Systems or Components
frameworkNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.2
sectionSR Supply Chain Risk Management
csf 2.0GV.SC-05 ID.RA-09
topics—
frameworks0 0 2
Official textInspect the following systems or system components [Selection (one or more): at random; at [Assignment: organization-defined frequency]; upon [Assignment: organization-defined indications of need for inspection] ] to detect tampering: [Assignment: organization-defined systems or system components].NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.2 control statement (public domain)
Wrong or missing mapping? Report it
| Framework | Requirement | Title | Link | Source / reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIST CSF 2.0 | GV.SC-05ID.RA-09 | Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritized, and integrated into contracts and other types of agreements with suppliers and other relevant third parties; The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software are assessed prior to acquisition and use | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.SC-05, ID.RA-09: related, not a mapping | |
| ISO 27001 | A.5.19A.5.20A.5.22A.5.31 | Information security in supplier relationships; Addressing information security within supplier agreements… | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.SC-05, ID.RA-09: related, not a mapping+1 more loosely related (not mappings)Clause 4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties Only shares CSF GV.SC-05: related, not a mapping | |
| CIS v8.1 | CIS 15.4 | Ensure Service Provider Contracts Include Security Requirements | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.SC-05: related, not a mapping | |
| SOC 2 | CC9.2 | Managing vendor and business partner risk | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.SC-05, ID.RA-09: related, not a mapping | |
| PCI DSS | 6.4.39.5.1.112.8.112.8.2 | Payment page scripts authorised and integrity-checked; Inventory of POI devices kept… | No mapping. Only shares CSF ID.RA-09, GV.SC-05: related, not a mapping+4 more loosely related (not mappings)12.8.3 Due diligence before engaging service providers Only shares CSF GV.SC-05: related, not a mapping 12.8.5 Responsibilities split with each provider documented Only shares CSF GV.SC-05: related, not a mapping 12.9.1 Service providers acknowledge responsibilities to customers Only shares CSF GV.SC-05: related, not a mapping 12.9.2 Service providers support customer compliance requests Only shares CSF GV.SC-05: related, not a mapping | |
| CMMC | RA.L2-3.11.1 | Risk Assessments | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.SC-05, ID.RA-09: related, not a mapping | |
| HIPAA | §164.308(b)(4)§164.314(a)§164.314(a)(2)(i)§164.314(a)(2)(iii) | Written Contract or Other Arrangement; Business Associate Contracts or Other Arrangements… | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.SC-05, ID.RA-09: related, not a mapping+6 more loosely related (not mappings)§164.308(b)(1) Business Associate Contracts and Other Arrangements Only shares CSF GV.SC-05: related, not a mapping §164.312(c)(2) Mechanism to Authenticate Electronic Protected Health Information Only shares CSF ID.RA-09: related, not a mapping …and 2 more in the downloads | |
| GDPR | Art.28(1) | Processor | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.SC-05, ID.RA-09: related, not a mapping | |
| NIS2 | 5.16.1 | Supply chain security policy; Security in acquisition of ICT services, ICT systems or ICT products | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.SC-05, ID.RA-09: related, not a mapping | |
| Essential Eight | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (Essential Eight links are editorial only). |
| DORA | Art.28(2)Art.29(1)Art.29(2) | General principles; Preliminary assessment of ICT concentration risk at entity level… | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.SC-05, ID.RA-09: related, not a mapping | |
| CPS 234 | Para 16Para 22 | Assess third parties' information security capability; Evaluate the design of third parties' controls | No mapping. Only shares CSF GV.SC-05, ID.RA-09: related, not a mapping | |
| Cyber Essentials | — | No requirement | No mapping in our data | No mapping in our data (Cyber Essentials covers five technical controls only). |
Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. How links are sourced.