Schwachstellenmanagement
Schwachstellen in Vermögenswerten der Organisation identifizieren und verwalten.
Schwachstellenmanagement wird durch die NIST CSF 2.0 Outcomes ID.RA-01 (Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded); ID.RA-08 (Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established) definiert. Crosswalk Über einen veröffentlichten Crosswalk zugeordnet in ISO 27001, CIS v8.1, PCI DSS, CMMC, 800-53, HIPAA und NIS2. Redaktionell Redaktionell zugeordnet in SOC 2, GDPR, Essential Eight, DORA, CPS 234 und Cyber Essentials.
| Framework | Anforderung | Titel | Verknüpfung | Quelle / Begründung |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIST CSF 2.0 | ID.RA-01ID.RA-08 | Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded; Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established | Themendefinition | ID.RA-01 ID.RA-08 |
| ISO 27001 | A.8.8 | Management of technical vulnerabilities | Crosswalk | A.8.8: via ID.RA-01; NIST 800-53 map: RA-5 |
| CIS v8.1 | CIS 7.1CIS 7.2CIS 7.5CIS 7.6CIS 7.7CIS 16.6CIS 18.1CIS 18.2CIS 18.3CIS 18.4CIS 18.5 | Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process; Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process; Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets… | Crosswalk | CIS 7.1: via ID.RA-01 CIS 7.2: via ID.RA-08 CIS 7.5: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): automated vulnerability scans of internal assets. CIS 7.6: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): automated vulnerability scans of external assets. CIS 7.7: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): remediate detected vulnerabilities. CIS 16.6: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): a severity rating process for application vulnerabilities. CIS 18.1: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): a penetration testing programme. CIS 18.2: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): periodic external penetration tests. CIS 18.3: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): remediate penetration test findings. CIS 18.4: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): validate security measures after penetration tests. CIS 18.5: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): periodic internal penetration tests. |
| SOC 2 | CC7.1 | Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities | Redaktionell | CC7.1: AICPA's TSC mappings are not openly licensed; ControlMapping editorial mapping (criterion summaries are ours, not AICPA text). |
| PCI DSS | 6.3.111.3.111.3.2 | Vulnerabilities identified and risk-ranked; Internal vulnerability scans every three months; External ASV scans every three months | Crosswalk | 6.3.1: via ID.RA-01 11.3.1: via ID.RA-01 11.3.2: via ID.RA-01 |
| CMMC | RA.L2-3.11.2RA.L2-3.11.3 | Vulnerability Scan; Vulnerability Remediation | Crosswalk | RA.L2-3.11.2: via 800-171r3 03.11.02 ↔ ID.RA-01, ID.RA-08 → RA-5; 800-171r2 Appendix D → RA-5 RA.L2-3.11.3: via 800-171r3 03.11.02 ↔ ID.RA-01, ID.RA-08 → RA-5; 800-171r2 Appendix D → RA-5 |
| 800-53 | RA-5CA-8 | Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning; Penetration Testing | Crosswalk | RA-5: via ID.RA-01; ID.RA-08 CA-8: via ID.RA-01 |
| HIPAA | §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)§164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B)§164.308(a)(8) | Risk Analysis; Risk Management; Evaluation | Crosswalk | §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A): The HIPAA risk analysis must identify vulnerabilities to ePHI; HHS guidance treats vulnerability identification as part of it. §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B): Risk management requires reducing identified risks and vulnerabilities to a reasonable level, which is where remediation sits in HIPAA. §164.308(a)(8): via NIST HIPAA map: CA-8 |
| GDPR | Art.32(1)(d) | Security of processing | Redaktionell | Art.32(1)(d): No official crosswalk exists for GDPR; ControlMapping editorial mapping. |
| NIS2 | 6.56.10 | Security testing; Vulnerability handling and disclosure | Crosswalk | 6.5: via ID.RA-01 6.10: via ID.RA-01; ID.RA-08; ENISA ISO map: A.8.8 |
| Essential Eight | ISM-1807ISM-1808ISM-1698ISM-1699ISM-1701ISM-1702 | An automated method of asset discovery is used at least fortnightly to support the…; A vulnerability scanner with an up-to-date vulnerability database is used for…; A vulnerability scanner is used at least daily to identify missing patches or updates for vulnerabilities in online…… | Redaktionell | ASD assigns these ISM controls to the Essential Eight; ASD publishes no crosswalk to NIST or ISO, so linking them to topics is ControlMapping editorial. |
| DORA | Art.8(2)Art.25(1)Art.26(1)Art.27(1) | Identification; Testing of ICT tools and systems; Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPT… | Redaktionell | Art.8(2): Assess ICT vulnerabilities on a continuous basis. Art.25(1): Testing includes vulnerability assessments and scans, and penetration testing. Art.26(1): Entities selected by their authority run threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) at least every three years. Art.27(1): Testers carrying out TLPT must be suitable, technically capable, certified or bound by a code of conduct, and insured. |
| CPS 234 | Para 17Para 27Para 30 | Keep capability current as threats and vulnerabilities change; Systematic testing programme for control effectiveness; Testing by skilled, functionally independent specialists | Redaktionell | Para 17: Actively maintain the security capability as vulnerabilities change. Para 27: A systematic testing programme whose frequency follows how fast vulnerabilities and threats change. Para 30: Testing by appropriately skilled and functionally independent specialists. |
| Cyber Essentials | CE 3 | Security Update Management | Redaktionell | CE 3: Fix known vulnerabilities: updates rated critical or high risk (CVSS v3 7 or above) within 14 days, and no unsupported software. |
Themendefinition CSF-2.0-Ergebnisse, die dieses Thema definieren · Crosswalk mindestens eine Auswahl, gestützt durch einen veröffentlichten Crosswalk · Redaktionell Einschätzung von ControlMapping mit Begründung · nicht zugeordnet, teilt nur die CSF-Ergebnisse dieses Themas · Keine Zuordnung in unseren Daten In unseren Daten nichts zugeordnet; oft neue Arbeit, aber prüfen Sie die Hinweise zur Abdeckung. Methodik.
Anforderungs-IDs und Titel werden so angezeigt, wie jedes Framework sie veröffentlicht, auf Englisch.
Falsche oder fehlende Zuordnung? Melden
Über Schwachstellenmanagement
Schwachstellenmanagement ist ein kontinuierlicher Prozess, bei dem Sicherheitslücken in der Infrastruktur, in Anwendungen und an Endgeräten einer Organisation erkannt, priorisiert und behoben werden. Wirksame Programme nutzen automatisierte Scan-Werkzeuge, um Schwachstellen zu identifizieren, eine risikobasierte Priorisierung (etwa anhand von CVSS-Werten in Verbindung mit der Kritikalität der Vermögenswerte und der Verfügbarkeit von Exploits), um Behebungsmaßnahmen gezielt zu steuern, sowie definierte SLAs für Patch-Zeitpläne. Regelmäßige Schwachstellenbewertungen und Penetrationstests bestätigen, dass Behebungsmaßnahmen wirksam sind und neue Schwachstellen zeitnah erkannt werden.