Gestion des vulnérabilités
Identifier et gérer les vulnérabilités des actifs de l'organisation.
Gestion des vulnérabilités est défini par les résultats NIST CSF 2.0 ID.RA-01 (Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded); ID.RA-08 (Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established). Correspondance Mis en correspondance par une correspondance publiée dans ISO 27001, CIS v8.1, PCI DSS, CMMC, 800-53, HIPAA et NIS2. Éditorial Mis en correspondance de manière éditoriale dans SOC 2, GDPR, Essential Eight, DORA, CPS 234 et Cyber Essentials.
| Référentiel | Exigence | Titre | Lien | Source / motif |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIST CSF 2.0 | ID.RA-01ID.RA-08 | Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded; Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established | Définition du sujet | ID.RA-01 ID.RA-08 |
| ISO 27001 | A.8.8 | Management of technical vulnerabilities | Correspondance | A.8.8: via ID.RA-01; NIST 800-53 map: RA-5 |
| CIS v8.1 | CIS 7.1CIS 7.2CIS 7.5CIS 7.6CIS 7.7CIS 16.6CIS 18.1CIS 18.2CIS 18.3CIS 18.4CIS 18.5 | Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process; Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process; Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets… | Correspondance | CIS 7.1: via ID.RA-01 CIS 7.2: via ID.RA-08 CIS 7.5: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): automated vulnerability scans of internal assets. CIS 7.6: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): automated vulnerability scans of external assets. CIS 7.7: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): remediate detected vulnerabilities. CIS 16.6: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): a severity rating process for application vulnerabilities. CIS 18.1: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): a penetration testing programme. CIS 18.2: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): periodic external penetration tests. CIS 18.3: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): remediate penetration test findings. CIS 18.4: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): validate security measures after penetration tests. CIS 18.5: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): periodic internal penetration tests. |
| SOC 2 | CC7.1 | Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities | Éditorial | CC7.1: AICPA's TSC mappings are not openly licensed; ControlMapping editorial mapping (criterion summaries are ours, not AICPA text). |
| PCI DSS | 6.3.111.3.111.3.2 | Vulnerabilities identified and risk-ranked; Internal vulnerability scans every three months; External ASV scans every three months | Correspondance | 6.3.1: via ID.RA-01 11.3.1: via ID.RA-01 11.3.2: via ID.RA-01 |
| CMMC | RA.L2-3.11.2RA.L2-3.11.3 | Vulnerability Scan; Vulnerability Remediation | Correspondance | RA.L2-3.11.2: via 800-171r3 03.11.02 ↔ ID.RA-01, ID.RA-08 → RA-5; 800-171r2 Appendix D → RA-5 RA.L2-3.11.3: via 800-171r3 03.11.02 ↔ ID.RA-01, ID.RA-08 → RA-5; 800-171r2 Appendix D → RA-5 |
| 800-53 | RA-5CA-8 | Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning; Penetration Testing | Correspondance | RA-5: via ID.RA-01; ID.RA-08 CA-8: via ID.RA-01 |
| HIPAA | §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)§164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B)§164.308(a)(8) | Risk Analysis; Risk Management; Evaluation | Correspondance | §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A): The HIPAA risk analysis must identify vulnerabilities to ePHI; HHS guidance treats vulnerability identification as part of it. §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B): Risk management requires reducing identified risks and vulnerabilities to a reasonable level, which is where remediation sits in HIPAA. §164.308(a)(8): via NIST HIPAA map: CA-8 |
| GDPR | Art.32(1)(d) | Security of processing | Éditorial | Art.32(1)(d): No official crosswalk exists for GDPR; ControlMapping editorial mapping. |
| NIS2 | 6.56.10 | Security testing; Vulnerability handling and disclosure | Correspondance | 6.5: via ID.RA-01 6.10: via ID.RA-01; ID.RA-08; ENISA ISO map: A.8.8 |
| Essential Eight | ISM-1807ISM-1808ISM-1698ISM-1699ISM-1701ISM-1702 | An automated method of asset discovery is used at least fortnightly to support the…; A vulnerability scanner with an up-to-date vulnerability database is used for…; A vulnerability scanner is used at least daily to identify missing patches or updates for vulnerabilities in online…… | Éditorial | ASD assigns these ISM controls to the Essential Eight; ASD publishes no crosswalk to NIST or ISO, so linking them to topics is ControlMapping editorial. |
| DORA | Art.8(2)Art.25(1)Art.26(1)Art.27(1) | Identification; Testing of ICT tools and systems; Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPT… | Éditorial | Art.8(2): Assess ICT vulnerabilities on a continuous basis. Art.25(1): Testing includes vulnerability assessments and scans, and penetration testing. Art.26(1): Entities selected by their authority run threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) at least every three years. Art.27(1): Testers carrying out TLPT must be suitable, technically capable, certified or bound by a code of conduct, and insured. |
| CPS 234 | Para 17Para 27Para 30 | Keep capability current as threats and vulnerabilities change; Systematic testing programme for control effectiveness; Testing by skilled, functionally independent specialists | Éditorial | Para 17: Actively maintain the security capability as vulnerabilities change. Para 27: A systematic testing programme whose frequency follows how fast vulnerabilities and threats change. Para 30: Testing by appropriately skilled and functionally independent specialists. |
| Cyber Essentials | CE 3 | Security Update Management | Éditorial | CE 3: Fix known vulnerabilities: updates rated critical or high risk (CVSS v3 7 or above) within 14 days, and no unsupported software. |
Définition du sujet Résultats CSF 2.0 qui définissent ce thème · Correspondance au moins un choix appuyé par une table de correspondance publiée · Éditorial Jugement de ControlMapping, avec le motif · non mappé, partage seulement les résultats CSF de ce thème · Aucune correspondance dans nos données rien de mappé dans nos données ; souvent un travail nouveau, mais consultez les notes de couverture. Méthodologie.
Les identifiants et intitulés des exigences sont présentés tels que chaque référentiel les publie, en anglais.
Correspondance erronée ou manquante ? Signaler
À propos de Gestion des vulnérabilités
La gestion des vulnérabilités est un processus continu de détection, de priorisation et de correction des failles de sécurité présentes dans l'infrastructure, les applications et les postes de travail de l'organisation. Les programmes efficaces s'appuient sur des outils de scan automatisés pour identifier les vulnérabilités, sur une priorisation fondée sur les risques (par exemple les scores CVSS combinés à la criticité des actifs et à la disponibilité d'un exploit) afin de concentrer les efforts de correction, ainsi que sur des délais de correction définis (SLA) pour l'application des correctifs. Des évaluations de vulnérabilités et des tests d'intrusion réguliers permettent de vérifier que les mesures correctives sont efficaces et que les nouvelles vulnérabilités sont identifiées rapidement.