SOC 2 vs CPS 234
SOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria) · APRA CPS 234 Information Security · data 2026-10-27
Requirement-level comparison of SOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria) and APRA CPS 234 Information Security, in both directions, derived from published crosswalks and ControlMapping's curated topics.
Of 24 APRA CPS 234 Information Security requirements, 23 map to something in SOC 2, 0 are only loosely related, and 1 have no mapping in our data.
CPS 234 is principles-based: it requires controls commensurate with threats without naming them, so most technical topics show no link. APRA's guide CPG 234 names specific practices but is not binding and not mapped. All links are editorial.
Likely new work: CPS 234 requirements with no mapping to SOC 2 (1)
| CPS 234 | Requirement | Match | SOC 2 | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing control effectiveness · 1 | ||||
| Para 29 | Escalate deficiencies that can't be fixed quickly | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to SOC 2 in our data. |
Mapped (23)
| CPS 234 | Requirement | Match | SOC 2 | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roles and responsibilities · 2 | ||||
| Para 13 | Board ultimately responsible for information security | Editorial | CC1.2CC1.3CC1.5+3 | Same topic: Roles & Responsibilities (editorial pick) |
| Para 14 | Define information security roles and responsibilities | Editorial | CC1.2CC1.3CC1.5 | Same topic: Roles & Responsibilities (editorial pick) |
| Information security capability · 3 | ||||
| Para 15 | Maintain a capability commensurate with threats | Editorial | CC3.1CC5.1CC9.1 | Same topic: Risk Management (editorial pick) |
| Para 16 | Assess third parties' information security capability | Editorial | CC9.2 | Same topic: Supply Chain Risk, Vendor Risk Mgmt (editorial pick) |
| Para 17 | Keep capability current as threats and vulnerabilities change | Editorial | CC3.2CC3.3CC3.4+1 | Same topic: Risk Assessment (editorial pick) |
| Policy framework · 2 | ||||
| Para 18 | Maintain an information security policy framework | Editorial | CC1.1CC5.3 | Same topic: Governance Policy (editorial pick) |
| Para 19 | Policies direct everyone with security obligations | Editorial | CC1.1CC5.3 | Same topic: Governance Policy (editorial pick) |
| Information asset identification and classification · 1 | ||||
| Para 20 | Classify information assets by criticality and sensitivity | Editorial | C1.1CC6.1 | Same topic: Data Classification, Asset Management (editorial pick) |
| Implementation of controls · 2 | ||||
| Para 21 | Timely controls commensurate with risk and asset life-cycle | Editorial | C1.2CC3.2CC3.3+2 | Same topic: Data Protection, Risk Assessment (editorial pick) |
| Para 22 | Evaluate the design of third parties' controls | Editorial | CC9.2 | Same topic: Supply Chain Risk, Vendor Risk Mgmt (editorial pick) |
| Incident management · 4 | ||||
| Para 23 | Detect and respond to incidents in a timely manner | Editorial | CC7.2CC7.3CC7.4 | Same topic: Intrusion Detection, Incident Response (editorial pick) |
| Para 24 | Maintain information security response plans | Editorial | CC7.3CC7.4 | Same topic: Incident Response (editorial pick) |
| Para 25 | Response plans cover all stages and escalation | Editorial | CC2.3CC7.3CC7.4+1 | Same topic: Communication, Incident Response (editorial pick) |
| Para 26 | Review and test response plans annually | Editorial | CC7.3CC7.4 | Same topic: Incident Response (editorial pick) |
| Testing control effectiveness · 4 | ||||
| Para 27 | Systematic testing programme for control effectiveness | Editorial | CC3.1CC5.1CC7.1+1 | Same topic: Risk Management, Vulnerability Mgmt (editorial pick) |
| Para 28 | Check third parties' control testing is adequate | Editorial | CC9.2 | Same topic: Vendor Risk Mgmt (editorial pick) |
| Para 30 | Testing by skilled, functionally independent specialists | Editorial | CC7.1 | Same topic: Vulnerability Mgmt (editorial pick) |
| Para 31 | Review the testing programme at least annually | Editorial | CC3.1CC5.1CC9.1 | Same topic: Risk Management (editorial pick) |
| Internal audit · 3 | ||||
| Para 32 | Internal audit reviews control design and effectiveness | Editorial | CC4.1CC4.2 | Same topic: Compliance (editorial pick) |
| Para 33 | Assurance provided by appropriately skilled personnel | Editorial | CC4.1CC4.2 | Same topic: Compliance (editorial pick) |
| Para 34 | Internal audit assesses third-party assurance relied on | Editorial | CC4.1CC4.2CC9.2 | Same topic: Compliance, Vendor Risk Mgmt (editorial pick) |
| APRA notification · 2 | ||||
| Para 35 | Notify APRA of material incidents within 72 hours | Editorial | CC2.3 | Same topic: Reporting (editorial pick) |
| Para 36 | Notify APRA of material control weaknesses within 10 business days | Editorial | CC2.3 | Same topic: Reporting (editorial pick) |
Of 61 SOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria) requirements, 24 map to something in CPS 234, 3 are only loosely related, and 34 have no mapping in our data.
AICPA's SOC 2 mappings aren't openly licensed, so every SOC 2 link here is ControlMapping editorial: criteria we haven't mapped can't match. Processing-integrity (PI) criteria and most privacy (P) criteria have no equivalent in security frameworks.
Likely new work: SOC 2 requirements with no mapping to CPS 234 (34)
| SOC 2 | Requirement | Match | CPS 234 | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 Availability · 3 | ||||
| A1.1 | Capacity management to meet availability commitments | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| A1.2 | Environmental protections, backups and recovery infrastructure | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| A1.3 | Testing recovery plan procedures | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| CC1 Control environment · 1 | ||||
| CC1.4 | Commitment to attracting, developing and retaining competent people | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| CC2 Communication and information · 2 | ||||
| CC2.1 | Quality information to support internal control | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| CC2.2 | Internal communication of objectives and responsibilities | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| CC5 Control activities · 1 | ||||
| CC5.2 | General controls over technology | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| CC6 Logical and physical access · 3 | ||||
| CC6.2 | User registration, authorization and removal | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| CC6.3 | Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| CC6.4 | Physical access restrictions | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| CC8 Change management · 1 | ||||
| CC8.1 | Change management for infrastructure, data and software | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P Privacy · 18 | ||||
| P1.1 | Privacy notice | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P2.1 | Choice and consent | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P3.1 | Collection limited to privacy objectives | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P3.2 | Explicit consent where required | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P4.1 | Use limited to privacy objectives | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P4.2 | Retention of personal information | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P4.3 | Disposal of personal information | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P5.1 | Data subject access | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P5.2 | Correction of personal information | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P6.1 | Disclosure to third parties with consent | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P6.2 | Record of authorized disclosures | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P6.3 | Record of unauthorized disclosures | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P6.4 | Privacy commitments from third parties | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P6.5 | Notification by third parties of unauthorized disclosures | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P6.6 | Breach notification to affected individuals | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P6.7 | Accounting of disclosures to data subjects | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P7.1 | Quality of personal information | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| P8.1 | Handling privacy inquiries, complaints and disputes | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| PI1 Processing integrity · 5 | ||||
| PI1.1 | Information about processing objectives | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| PI1.2 | Controls over system inputs | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| PI1.3 | Controls over system processing | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| PI1.4 | Controls over system outputs | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
| PI1.5 | Storing inputs, items in processing and outputs | No mapping in our data | — | No mapping to CPS 234 in our data. |
Check these: only loosely related (a shared CSF outcome, not a mapping) (3)
| SOC 2 | Requirement | Match | CPS 234 | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC6 Logical and physical access · 3 | ||||
| CC6.6 | Protection against threats from outside system boundaries | Para 23 | Only shares CSF DE.CM-01: related, not a mapping | |
| CC6.7 | Restricting transmission, movement and removal of information | Para 21 | Only shares CSF PR.DS-01, PR.DS-02, PR.DS-10: related, not a mapping | |
| CC6.8 | Preventing or detecting unauthorized or malicious software | Para 21 | Only shares CSF PR.DS-02: related, not a mapping | |
Mapped (24)
| SOC 2 | Requirement | Match | CPS 234 | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 Confidentiality · 2 | ||||
| C1.1 | Identifying and protecting confidential information | Editorial | Para 20 | Same topic: Data Classification (editorial pick) |
| C1.2 | Disposing of confidential information | Editorial | Para 21 | Same topic: Data Protection (editorial pick) |
| CC1 Control environment · 4 | ||||
| CC1.1 | Commitment to integrity and ethical values | Editorial | Para 18Para 19 | Same topic: Governance Policy (editorial pick) |
| CC1.2 | Board independence and oversight of internal control | Editorial | Para 13Para 14 | Same topic: Roles & Responsibilities (editorial pick) |
| CC1.3 | Structures, reporting lines, authorities and responsibilities | Editorial | Para 13Para 14 | Same topic: Roles & Responsibilities (editorial pick) |
| CC1.5 | Accountability for internal control responsibilities | Editorial | Para 13Para 14 | Same topic: Roles & Responsibilities (editorial pick) |
| CC2 Communication and information · 1 | ||||
| CC2.3 | Communication with external parties | Editorial | Para 25Para 35Para 36 | Same topic: Communication, Reporting (editorial pick) |
| CC3 Risk assessment · 4 | ||||
| CC3.1 | Objectives specified clearly enough to identify risks | Editorial | Para 13Para 15Para 27+1 | Same topic: Risk Management (editorial pick) |
| CC3.2 | Risk identification and analysis | Editorial | Para 17Para 21 | Same topic: Risk Assessment (editorial pick) |
| CC3.3 | Considering the potential for fraud | Editorial | Para 17Para 21 | Same topic: Risk Assessment (editorial pick) |
| CC3.4 | Identifying and assessing significant changes | Editorial | Para 17Para 21 | Same topic: Risk Assessment (editorial pick) |
| CC4 Monitoring activities · 2 | ||||
| CC4.1 | Ongoing and/or separate evaluations of controls | Editorial | Para 32Para 33Para 34 | Same topic: Compliance (editorial pick) |
| CC4.2 | Communicating and remediating control deficiencies | Editorial | Para 32Para 33Para 34 | Same topic: Compliance (editorial pick) |
| CC5 Control activities · 2 | ||||
| CC5.1 | Control activities that mitigate risks | Editorial | Para 13Para 15Para 27+1 | Same topic: Risk Management (editorial pick) |
| CC5.3 | Control activities deployed through policies and procedures | Editorial | Para 18Para 19 | Same topic: Governance Policy (editorial pick) |
| CC6 Logical and physical access · 2 | ||||
| CC6.1 | Logical access security over information assets | Editorial | Para 20 | Same topic: Asset Management (editorial pick) |
| CC6.5 | Protection of data when assets are disposed of | Editorial | Para 21 | Same topic: Data Protection (editorial pick) |
| CC7 System operations · 5 | ||||
| CC7.1 | Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities | Editorial | Para 17Para 27Para 30 | Same topic: Vulnerability Mgmt (editorial pick) |
| CC7.2 | Monitoring system components for anomalies | Editorial | Para 23 | Same topic: Intrusion Detection (editorial pick) |
| CC7.3 | Evaluating security events to determine if they are incidents | Editorial | Para 23Para 24Para 25+1 | Same topic: Incident Response (editorial pick) |
| CC7.4 | Responding to identified security incidents | Editorial | Para 23Para 24Para 25+1 | Same topic: Incident Response (editorial pick) |
| CC7.5 | Recovering from identified security incidents | Editorial | Para 25 | Same topic: Lessons Learned (editorial pick) |
| CC9 Risk mitigation · 2 | ||||
| CC9.1 | Mitigating risks from business disruptions | Editorial | Para 13Para 15Para 27+1 | Same topic: Risk Management (editorial pick) |
| CC9.2 | Managing vendor and business partner risk | Editorial | Para 16Para 22Para 28+1 | Same topic: Supply Chain Risk, Vendor Risk Mgmt (editorial pick) |
By topic
Both cover (16):
Only SOC 2 (30):
Only CPS 234 (1):
Crosswalk a published crosswalk (NIST, ENISA, CIS, PCI SSC) makes the link · Editorial ControlMapping's judgement where no crosswalk exists; the reason is shown · only shares a CSF 2.0 outcome: worth checking, not a mapping · No mapping in our data nothing mapped in our data; often new work, but check the coverage notes. Mapped = curated together in a ControlMapping topic, or linked directly. Crosswalks don't prove compliance. Methodology · Download the data · Report a mistake.