사고 대응
사고 대응 프로세스를 수립하고 실행합니다.
사고 대응은 NIST CSF 2.0의 RS.MA-01 (The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties once an incident is declared); RS.MA-02 (Incident reports are triaged and validated); RS.MA-03 (Incidents are categorized and prioritized); RS.MA-04 (Incidents are escalated or elevated as needed); ID.IM-04 (Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved) 결과들로 정의됩니다. 대응표 ISO 27001, CIS v8.1, PCI DSS, CMMC, 800-53, HIPAA 및 NIS2의 공개 크로스워크를 통해 매핑됨. 편집 콘텐츠 SOC 2, GDPR, Essential Eight, DORA 및 CPS 234에 편집 방식으로 매핑됨. 보유 데이터에 매핑 없음 보유 데이터에 Cyber Essentials에 대한 매핑이 없습니다.
| 프레임워크 | 요구사항 | 제목 | 링크 | 출처 / 사유 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIST CSF 2.0 | RS.MA-01RS.MA-02RS.MA-03RS.MA-04ID.IM-04 | The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties once an incident is declared; Incident reports are triaged and validated; Incidents are categorized and prioritized… | 주제 정의 | RS.MA-01 RS.MA-02 RS.MA-03 RS.MA-04 ID.IM-04 |
| ISO 27001 | A.5.24A.5.25A.5.26 | Information security incident management planning and preparation; Assessment and decision on information security events; Response to information security incidents | 대응표 | A.5.24: via RS.MA-02; ID.IM-04; NIST 800-53 map: IR-8 A.5.25: via RS.MA-03; NIST 800-53 map: IR-4 A.5.26: via RS.MA-01; RS.MA-02; RS.MA-04; ID.IM-04; NIST 800-53 map: IR-4 |
| CIS v8.1 | CIS 17.1CIS 17.4CIS 17.5CIS 17.7CIS 17.9 | Designate Personnel to Manage Incident Handling; Establish and Maintain an Incident Response Process; Assign Key Roles and Responsibilities… | 대응표 | CIS 17.1: Designate personnel to manage incident handling; not in CIS's own crosswalk to CSF 2.0, which covers 49 of 153 safeguards. CIS 17.4: via RS.MA-01 CIS 17.5: Assign key roles and responsibilities for incident response, including legal, IT, security and communications. CIS 17.7: Routine incident response exercises and scenarios to test the plan and staff. CIS 17.9: Editorial (CIS's published crosswalk covers 49 of 153 safeguards): security incident thresholds that trigger the response process. |
| SOC 2 | CC7.4CC7.3 | Responding to identified security incidents; Evaluating security events to determine if they are incidents | 편집 콘텐츠 | AICPA's TSC mappings are not openly licensed; ControlMapping editorial mapping (criterion summaries are ours, not AICPA text). |
| PCI DSS | 12.10.112.10.312.10.212.10.4 | Incident response plan ready to activate; Incident response staff available around the clock; Incident response plan reviewed and tested annually… | 대응표 | 12.10.1: via RS.MA-01; RS.MA-02; RS.MA-03; RS.MA-04; ID.IM-04 12.10.3: via RS.MA-01; RS.MA-04; ID.IM-04 12.10.2: via RS.MA-01; RS.MA-03; RS.MA-04; ID.IM-04 12.10.4: via RS.MA-02 |
| CMMC | IR.L2-3.6.1IR.L2-3.6.3 | Incident Handling; Incident Response Testing | 대응표 | IR.L2-3.6.1: via 800-171r3 03.06.01 ↔ RS.MA-02, RS.MA-03, RS.MA-04 → IR-4; 800-171r2 Appendix D → IR-4 IR.L2-3.6.3: Test the organizational incident response capability. |
| 800-53 | IR-4IR-8IR-2IR-3 | Incident Handling; Incident Response Plan; Incident Response Training… | 대응표 | IR-4: via RS.MA-02; RS.MA-03; RS.MA-04 IR-8: via RS.MA-01; ID.IM-04 IR-2: Incident response training for the people who run the plan; NIST links IR-2 to PR.AT outcomes rather than RS.MA. IR-3: Testing incident response capability; NIST links IR-3 to ID.IM-02 (improvements from tests) rather than the RS.MA outcomes. |
| HIPAA | §164.308(a)(6)§164.308(a)(6)(ii) | Security Incident Procedures; Response and Reporting | 대응표 | §164.308(a)(6): via NIST HIPAA map: IR-4 §164.308(a)(6)(ii): via NIST HIPAA map: IR-4, IR-8 |
| GDPR | Art.33(1)Art.33(5) | Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority; Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority | 편집 콘텐츠 | No official crosswalk exists for GDPR; ControlMapping editorial mapping. |
| NIS2 | 3.13.5 | Incident handling policy; Incident response | 대응표 | 3.1: via RS.MA-01; ENISA ISO map: A.5.24 3.5: via RS.MA-01; RS.MA-02; RS.MA-03; RS.MA-04; ENISA ISO map: A.5.26 |
| Essential Eight | ISM-1819 | Following the identification of a cyber security incident, the cyber security incident… | 편집 콘텐츠 | ISM-1819: ASD assigns these ISM controls to the Essential Eight; ASD publishes no crosswalk to NIST or ISO, so linking them to topics is ControlMapping editorial. |
| DORA | Art.17(1)Art.17(3)Art.11(2)(b)Art.18(1) | ICT-related incident management process; ICT-related incident management process; Response and recovery… | 편집 콘텐츠 | Art.17(1): An ICT-related incident management process to detect, manage and notify incidents. Art.17(3): Early warning indicators, classification, roles, communication, escalation and response procedures. Art.11(2)(b): Respond to and resolve ICT-related incidents quickly, limiting damage. Art.18(1): Classify ICT-related incidents and determine their impact using the regulation's criteria: clients affected, duration, geographical spread, data losses, criticality and economic impact. |
| CPS 234 | Para 23Para 24Para 25Para 26 | Detect and respond to incidents in a timely manner; Maintain information security response plans; Response plans cover all stages and escalation… | 편집 콘텐츠 | Para 23: Robust mechanisms to respond to information security incidents in a timely manner. Para 24: Response plans for incidents that could plausibly occur. Para 25: Plans cover every stage from detection to post-incident review, and escalation. Para 26: Review and test response plans annually. |
| Cyber Essentials | — | 요구사항 없음 | 보유 데이터에 매핑 없음 | 보유 데이터에서 이 주제에 매핑된 Cyber Essentials 요구사항이 없습니다. |
주제 정의 이 주제를 정의하는 CSF 2.0 결과 · 대응표 공개된 크로스워크로 뒷받침되는 항목을 최소 하나 이상 선택 · 편집 콘텐츠 ControlMapping의 판단과 사유 · 매핑되지 않음, 이 주제의 CSF 성과만 공유함 · 보유 데이터에 매핑 없음 당사 데이터에 매핑된 항목이 없음. 대개 신규 작업이지만 적용 범위 안내를 확인하세요. 방법론.
요구사항 ID와 제목은 각 프레임워크가 발표한 그대로 영문으로 표시됩니다.
매핑이 잘못되었거나 누락되었나요? 신고하기
사고 대응 소개
사고 대응 프로그램은 조직이 사이버보안 사고를 탐지하고, 봉쇄하고, 근절하며, 복구하기 위해 따르는 체계적인 프로세스와 절차를 제공합니다. 사고 대응 계획에는 심각도 수준, 역할과 책임, 커뮤니케이션 프로토콜, 에스컬레이션 절차, 그리고 법무, 커뮤니케이션, 경영진 팀과의 연계 방안이 정의되어야 합니다. 정기적인 탁상 훈련과 시뮬레이션 기반 사고 모의 훈련을 통해 계획의 실효성을 점검하고, 격차를 식별하며, 실제 사고 발생 시 팀원이 압박 상황에서도 자신의 책임을 수행할 수 있는지 확인합니다.